FRIDAY (2-FEB-24)

Pair 5 EW - MARGARET PEROSIN / JOHN BOURKE
Place: 1, Percentage: 57.08%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	3: LOIS MCDERMOTT / PAT JONES	2 E		6	-100	0	0%
Board 2	3: LOIS MCDERMOTT / PAT JONES	1NT E		9	150	4	50%
Board 3	3: LOIS MCDERMOTT / PAT JONES	4NT E		10	630	8	100%
Board 4	3: LOIS MCDERMOTT / PAT JONES	4 N		9	100	3	38%
Board 5	3: LOIS MCDERMOTT / PAT JONES	3NT W		13	520	7	88%
Board 6	3: LOIS MCDERMOTT / PAT JONES	4 N		9	50	5	62%
Board 7	1: JOAN STAINES / FRANK LAMOND	2NT S		10	-180	6	75%
Board 8	1: JOAN STAINES / FRANK LAMOND	3 E		7	-100	6	75%
Board 9	1: JOAN STAINES / FRANK LAMOND	5 E		11	650	6	75%
Board 10	1: JOAN STAINES / FRANK LAMOND	1NT E		9	150	7	88%
Board 11	1: JOAN STAINES / FRANK LAMOND	4 S		9	50	7	88%
Board 12	1: JOAN STAINES / FRANK LAMOND	4 N		12	-680	3	38%
Board 13	4: KAY GEDDES / RENA VITUCCI	5 N		10	100	6	75%
Board 14	4: KAY GEDDES / RENA VITUCCI	2 N		9	-140	5	62%
Board 15	4: KAY GEDDES / RENA VITUCCI	5 W		9	-100	1	12%
Board 16	4: KAY GEDDES / RENA VITUCCI	1NT E		9	150	7	88%
Board 17	4: KAY GEDDES / RENA VITUCCI	3 E		8	-50	4	50%
Board 18	4: KAY GEDDES / RENA VITUCCI	3NT S		10	-630	0	0%
Board 19	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	4 W		8	-200	1	12%
Board 20	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	2 N		5	300	5	62%
Board 21	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	5 E		5	-300	2	25%
Board 22	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	3 N		8	50	0	0%
Board 23	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	2 W		9	140	8	100%
Board 24	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	4 N		9	50	4	50%
Board 25	5: MAVIS GOW / ANNE GALE	3 E		9	140	5	62%
Board 26	5: MAVIS GOW / ANNE GALE	1 E		11	200	5	62%
Board 27	5: MAVIS GOW / ANNE GALE	3 E		10	130	6	75%
Board 28	5: MAVIS GOW / ANNE GALE	5 E		11	400	6	75%
Board 29	5: MAVIS GOW / ANNE GALE	1 E		8	110	4	50%
Board 30	5: MAVIS GOW / ANNE GALE	2 S		9	-110	6	75%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.