FRIDAY AFTERNOON (10-JAN-25)

Pair 4 EW - LESLIE MCCULLOUGH / MARGARET PEROSIN
Place: 3, Percentage: 44.64%

Board No	vs Pr	Contract	Lead	Result	Score	Matchpoints	%
Board 1	4: ROSE ALPEN / ANNE GALE	2 N		11	-150	1	17%
Board 2	4: ROSE ALPEN / ANNE GALE	4 E		10	420	5	83%
Board 3	4: ROSE ALPEN / ANNE GALE	1 S		8	-90	1	17%
Board 4	4: ROSE ALPEN / ANNE GALE	3 E		10	170	4	67%
Board 5	4: ROSE ALPEN / ANNE GALE	2NT W		8	120	4	67%
Board 6	4: ROSE ALPEN / ANNE GALE	4 S		10	-420	0	0%
Board 7	4: ROSE ALPEN / ANNE GALE	4 S		8	200	6	100%
Board 8	1: PETER DEN HOUTING / FRANK LAMOND	1NT W		10	180	4	67%
Board 9	1: PETER DEN HOUTING / FRANK LAMOND	4 E		8	-200	1	17%
Board 10	1: PETER DEN HOUTING / FRANK LAMOND	5 W		12	620	3	50%
Board 11	1: PETER DEN HOUTING / FRANK LAMOND	4 S		10	-420	2	33%
Board 12	1: PETER DEN HOUTING / FRANK LAMOND	2 E		6	-100	3	50%
Board 13	1: PETER DEN HOUTING / FRANK LAMOND	2 S		9	-140	1	17%
Board 14	1: PETER DEN HOUTING / FRANK LAMOND	2NT E		5	-150	2	33%
Board 15	3: KAY GEDDES / RINA VITUCCI	5 N		12	-680	4	67%
Board 16	3: KAY GEDDES / RINA VITUCCI	2 E		9	140	5	83%
Board 17	3: KAY GEDDES / RINA VITUCCI	3NT S		9	-400	2	33%
Board 18	3: KAY GEDDES / RINA VITUCCI	4X W		8	-300	0	0%
Board 19	3: KAY GEDDES / RINA VITUCCI	5NT W		13	720	2	33%
Board 20	3: KAY GEDDES / RINA VITUCCI	4 W		9	-100	4	67%
Board 21	3: KAY GEDDES / RINA VITUCCI	1 N		9	-140	2	33%
Board 22	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	4X N		9	100	5	83%
Board 23	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	3NT E		9	600	6	100%
Board 24	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	3NT N		9	-400	3	50%
Board 25	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	3NT E		9	600	4	67%
Board 26	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	5X N		11	-850	0	0%
Board 27	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	3NT N		11	-460	0	0%
Board 28	2: DAVID THOMPSON / MURIEL SHAW	2 E		5	-150	1	17%

Click on the Board Number to display that complete board, or click on a Pair to show that Pair's performance.